...

UniPayGateway

July 18, 2018
Written by
James Davis
Written by James Davis
Senior Technical Writer at United Thinkers

Author of the Paylosophy blog, a veteran writer, and a stock analyst with extensive knowledge and experience in the financial services industry that allows me to cover the latest payment industry news, developments, and insights. Read more

Reviewed by
Kathrine Pensatori
Product Specialist at United Thinkers

Product specialist with more than 10 years of experience in the Payment Processing Industry. I help payment facilitators and PSPs solve their various payment processing issues. Read more

Software Platform Provider Model Implementation

Payment facilitator implementation

Payment facilitator model implementation is a beneficial option for many SaaS and POS platform providers. A software platform provider, that is, usually, acting as an ordinary ISO, already has a certain degree of control over its customers, but is unable to influence the crucial processes, involved in merchant lifecycle, such as merchant onboarding, funding, remittance, reconciliation, etc. By assuming responsibility for part or all of these processes, a software platform provider can allow the processor to save some resources. In exchange the processor might be willing to share some of these resources with the platform provider. If the software platform provider decides to start offering merchant services, it can either become a wholesale ISO, or a PayFac. The wholesale ISO scenario is less profitable, but easier to follow, while payment facilitator model takes more effort to implement, but it is more lucrative, and, in addition, provides the software platform with greater control over merchant lifecycle.

If you are a large software platform provider and you want to increase your revenues, you might benefit significantly from implementation of a wholesale ISO or a PayFac model. Read more about how you can do this in the respective article on Paylosophy.

Useful articles to help you: